Effect of Live animal export on the Australian National herd

Figure 1 – The Australian cattle herd as compared to the volume of animals processed for slaughter and those sent to live export.

Notice with this chart I have used two scales – read the slaughter of only mature animals and live exported animals (of all types on the right hand side). The base scale of years though showing calendar years in relation to the national herd is actually in financial years for the slaughter and live export figures. The reason being I could only find long historic records for live export in this format for a collective year and was unable to correlate to calendar years.

Part II. b. charts 001_edited-1

Figure 1 – National cattle herd compared to national slaughter. 1973 – 2013

There is a direct relationship between numbers of animals available in production to what is sold but in my opinion it is only one factor which affects reason for sale. Others are personal circumstances, weather, animal types, market specifications, market timing and market prices to name only a few

The above chart (normally only showing National herd and mature cattle slaughter figures) is a favourite generalisation used by advocates for banning live export.  They say lack of significant increase in slaughter corresponding to National herd increases is due to animals being sent to live export and causes its (Australian slaughter) direct detriment. They claim that animals in the National herd should all be targeted to domestic slaughter points, irrespective of location of where those animals are raised.

What they fail to recognise is that a proportion of the national herd has developed solely for the supply of animals to live export. Notice a corresponding increase in the National herd gradually occurred over a similar period as the stronger development of live export occurred. This follows on from the BTEC (Brucellosis & Tuberculosis Eradication campaign) years in which the Northern herds developed mainly were Brahman. People advocating a ban of live export assume the National herd figures as shown would have occurred if live cattle export hadn’t developed, this is simply a fallacy.

Without the live export markets available to north Australian properties it is my opinion the National herd would currently only be in the low to mid 20M. In fact without live export to support national herd growth I believe slaughter numbers in Australia would have actually been far reduced from the past 10-15 year levels. It is estimated that 6.5M head across the north of Australia is the production base for the animals sold into live export markets from northern ports, though some producers send some to Australian abattoirs the greater volume of northern turn off is for the live export trade. The majority of  these animals produced were never intended or aimed at Australian processing facilities.

If properties such as my own relied solely on Australian processors to pay viable rates for their cattle they would have stopped animal production many years ago due to failure to make a living. Land value increases in the Northern territory are directly attributable to live export markets. Investment and improvements made in both land and cattle were made due to Live animal export markets operating.

Advertisements
Categories: Australian abattoirs, Beef Industry, Live Exports | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Post navigation

3 thoughts on “Effect of Live animal export on the Australian National herd

  1. After having a line of quality (milk to 6 teeth) 83 day grain fed bulls grade grass fed ox this week – the same breed of older cull bulls two years ago on 10 days less grain graded grain fed steer – for a discount of approx 50 cents a kg on the grid this time around – and a grain and handling bill of approx $480 a head to pay – all because there is no longer a sustainable market for stud brahmans due to the live export and BJD debacle – makes me feel like exiting the industry. We actually ended up with a better net result for calves processed straight off their mothers last month than grain fed bulls which averaged 340kg dressed wt. Where are we going – down the gurgler where the animal activists want us – the federal and state government policies have done more damage to our business in 2 years than the last 40 years of drought flood and fire. That’s an undisputable fact!

  2. A correction there sorry – they graded grass fed bull money on the grid naturally, not ox. a lot of work has been done on meat quality of entire males – and in the circumstances of grain fed animals where all other specs fall into the grid – the ability to grade those animals as grass fed of the lowest order needs to be re-assesed by the Ausmeat graders who take that power into their hands. The science says this meat can be graded ox in many cases and I believe this should have been one of them.

  3. Pingback: A Perfect Storm | Ann Britton Photography

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: